See every side of every news story
Published loading...Updated

Tara Moore's Four-Year Doping Ban Upheld by CAS | Sports-Games

UNITED KINGDOM, JUL 15 – The Court of Arbitration for Sport reinstated Moore's ban after she failed to prove her positive test for anabolic steroids was unintentional, sidelining her until 2028, officials said.

  • British tennis player Tara Moore received a four-year doping ban starting July 15 after CAS upheld ITIA's appeal.
  • Moore tested positive in April 2022 for anabolic steroids nandrolone and boldenone but was initially cleared due to suspected contaminated meat.
  • The ITIA appealed the clearing, with CAS ruling Moore failed to explain the nandrolone levels and rejected her defense and cross-appeal.
  • CAS concluded that the athlete failed to demonstrate that the level of nandrolone detected was attributable to consuming contaminated meat, thereby supporting ITIA's position.
  • The ban includes credit for time served under provisional suspension, effectively sidelining Moore for almost two years and reinforcing the commitment to rigorous antidoping enforcement.
Insights by Ground AI
Does this summary seem wrong?

44 Articles

merkur.demerkur.de
+2 Reposted by 2 other sources
Center

First acquitted, now closed. After the ITIA's objection, the CAS condemns British tennis player Tara Moore for dopings.

Read Full Article
Left

Tara Moore, 32, has been banned for four years for doping after the tennis player's explanation that she ate contaminated meat was rejected.

·Stockholm, Sweden
Read Full Article
Think freely.Subscribe and get full access to Ground NewsSubscriptions start at $9.99/yearSubscribe

Bias Distribution

  • 62% of the sources lean Left
62% Left
Factuality

To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium

Ownership

To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage

Pénzcentrum broke the news in on Tuesday, July 15, 2025.
Sources are mostly out of (0)

You have read 1 out of your 5 free daily articles.

Join millions of well-informed readers who use Ground to compare coverage, check their news blindspots, and challenge their worldview.