Supreme Court Weighs Challenge on Campaign Spending Restrictions Brought by JD Vance

What You Need To Know About The Supreme Court’s Citizens United 2.0

Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a GOP-backed effort to repeal campaign finance limits on how much money parties can redirect to individual candidates. This case could expand the court’s 2010 Citizens United decision, which overturned generations of anti-corruption campaign finance regulation and opened the floodgates of corporate and billionaire political giving.The Citizens United decision still kept intact decades-old…

NRSC And JD Vance vs FEC: The Final Domino Is About To Fall

In 2010 Citizens United legalized corporate money as free speech. In 2014 McCutcheon vs. FEC removed all limits to aggregate spending on elections. Now the Supremely Corrupt Court has positioned itself to remove the last barrier to the outright...

Supreme Court weighs challenge on campaign spending restrictions brought by JD Vance

Vice President JD Vance's lawsuit, filed when he was an Ohio senator, challenges restrictions on how much parties can spend in coordination with candidates.

Supreme Court hears oral arguments in campaign finance case

The NRCC, NRSC, Vice President JD Vance, and former Rep. Steve Chabot brought the case against the Federal Election Commission, arguing for the elimination of limits on coordinated spending

Supreme Court Takes Up Vance Bid to End Party Spending Caps