US EditionSupreme Court shows unflinching regard for Trump
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, UNITED STATES, JUL 29 – The New York Times condemns the Supreme Court for issuing brief, unsigned emergency rulings favoring Trump in nearly all cases, raising concerns about judicial transparency and independence.
- On Monday, the New York Times editorial board criticized the Supreme Court for `brief, unsigned rulings` during President Donald Trump’s second term, accusing them of ducking core responsibilities.
- Amid surging appeals, critics argue the emergency docket obscures justices' reasoning and favors the Trump administration, raising concerns about bias during Trump's second term.
- Last month, President Donald Trump prevailed in all but two emergency appeals, with a partial win in a third, and the court greenlit measures like revoking migrant protections and freezing $65 million in teacher grants.
- The New York Times argued that the emergency docket's repeated use `diminishes public confidence in government when that confidence is already low`, as justices are expected to base decisions on law, not ideology.
- Recent months show the conservative majority’s power recalibration that Congress seems unlikely to challenge soon, as petitions flood the emergency docket in Trump’s second term.
18 Articles
18 Articles
For whom do the Justices write? Searching for transparency
Growing calls for greater transparency in the work of the U.S. Supreme Court — from scholars, media and the justices themselves — reflect declining public confidence in the Court, particularly considering the High Bench’s increasing use of the emergency docket.…
'The worst': Supreme Court Justice John Roberts shamed as bending to Trump to save himself
The U.S. Supreme Court's decision to place Donald Trump beyond the reach of law looks worse with every passing week, according to a legal expert, and Chief Justice John Roberts may be remembered as the last person to hold his position.The court's right-wing majority ruled in favor of the president, ...
'All power to Trump': 'Worst modern chief justice' John Roberts bashed in scathing editorial
Law professor Gene Nichol tells The State that Chief Justice John Roberts and his Republican-friendly colleagues keep bestowing “never-before-enjoyed authorities upon the Trump Administration.”“Recent steps by the Supreme Court have allowed the executive branch to decimate the Department of Education, summarily fire tens of thousands of other civil servants, permit ‘third country removals’ to notoriously dangerous nations despite demonstrated li…
Colorado Politics
Supreme Court’s emergency docket orders frustrate liberal justices
The Supreme Court typically takes its time when deciding cases, but the Left’s flurry of lawsuits against the Trump administration has filled up the high court’s emergency docket and forced the justices to issue consequential emergency orders, frustrating some of…
Analysis: Supreme Court shows unflinching regard for Trump
Ever since Chief Justice John Roberts swore in Donald Trump at the US Capitol January 20 – with the eight other Supreme Court justices looking on – the question has been whether they would restrain a president who vowed to upend the constitutional order.
Supreme Court Shows Unflinching Regard for Trump
“Ever since Chief Justice John Roberts swore in Donald Trump at the US Capitol January 20 – with the eight other Supreme Court justices looking on – the question has been whether they would restrain a president who vowed to upend the constitutional order,” CNN reports. “The answer, a half-year later, is no.” “That was underscored this month by the court’s decisions allowing Trump to fire another set of independent regulators, to dismantle the De…
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 62% of the sources are Center
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
