US EditionSupreme Court grants extra time for arguments in tariff case
The Supreme Court doubled oral argument time to 80 minutes for Nov. 5, highlighting the case's significance in defining presidential tariff powers under the 1977 law.
- Recently, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to extend oral arguments to 80 minutes for the challenge to President Donald Trump's tariffs, with specific time allocations, while denying Blackfeet Nation members' intervention request.
- Questions about separation of powers prompted the case to reach the high court as it asks whether the International Emergency Economic Powers Act authorizes President Donald Trump to impose tariffs and whether this unconstitutionally delegates legislative power.
- The court assigned specific time splits for advocates, with the U.S. solicitor general receiving 40 minutes and private business groups and Democrat-led states each getting 20 minutes, while some parties sought additional time.
- President Donald Trump said he might attend the court session, which the Supreme Court Historical Society says may be unprecedented, while tariffs have raised about $200 billion this year, risking losses to the U.S. Treasury.
- Analyses show striking differences in revenue projections if tariffs are struck down; the Congressional Budget Office estimates $4 trillion, while The Budget Lab at Yale forecasts a 70% drop, and Solicitor General Dean John Sauer urges courts to see Section 122 as complementary to IEEPA.
47 Articles
47 Articles
Carolina Journal
Carolina Coast OnlineLocke SCOTUS brief challenges Trump’s authority for tariffs
The John Locke Foundation filed a joint friend-of-the-court brief Friday at the nation’s highest court challenging President Donald Trump’s emergency authority to enact tariffs. The US Supreme Court is scheduled to hear oral arguments about the issue on Nov. 5. The court combined two cases tackling Trump’s tariffs: Learning Resources Inc. v. Trump and Trump v. VOS Selections Inc. Locke joined the Arizona-based Goldwater Institute and Dallas Mark…
Trump tariffs panned by 2 former Federal Reserve chairs in U.S. Supreme Court filing
A slate of prominent economists from across the political spectrum, including former Federal Reserve Chairs Ben Bernanke and Janet Yellen, urged the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn most of President Donald Trump’s global tariffs, saying they’re based on misconceptions about the global economy.
Trump Tariffs Panned by Bernanke, Yellen in Supreme Court Filing
A slate of economists from across the political spectrum, including former Federal Reserve Chairs Ben Bernanke and Janet Yellen, urged the US Supreme Court to overturn most of President Donald Trump’s tariffs, saying they’re based on misconceptions about the global economy.
InsideNoVA.com
Supreme Court grants extra time for arguments in tariff case
(The Center Square) – The U.S. Supreme Court will grant some additional time for oral arguments in a case challenging President Donald Trump's tariff authority, but won't let tribal members participate.
Canada believes tariffs will continue despite upcoming hearing | Iowa Agribusiness Radio Network
President Donald Trump said that he, personally, wants to attend next month’s Supreme Court hearing on his tariff policies. Beginning November 5th, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on whether the president can unilaterally impose tariffs under emergency powers and is acting legally in his bypassing of Congress. The case involves the import tariffs against Canada, Mexico, and China over allegations of fentanyl trafficking as well as
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 48% of the sources are Center
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
