The United States opts for kidnapping because it cannot afford the prolonged “financial wear and tear of legitimacy in endless wars,” which implicitly formulates the doctrine according to which the kidnapping or annihilation of the head of state is tantamount to the annihilation, confiscation or hijacking of sovereignty. If such a doctrine is generalized, it would mean the end of the “rule-based international order.” Or to put it simply, of the …
This story is only covered by news sources that have yet to be evaluated by the independent media monitoring agencies we use to assess the quality and reliability of news outlets on our platform. Learn more here.
The United States opts for kidnapping because it cannot afford the prolonged “financial wear and tear of legitimacy in endless wars,” which implicitly formulates the doctrine according to which the kidnapping or annihilation of the head of state is tantamount to the annihilation, confiscation or hijacking of sovereignty. If such a doctrine is generalized, it would mean the end of the “rule-based international order.” Or to put it simply, of the …