‘Signalgate’ proves that DC never lets a ‘crisis’ — serious or not — go to waste
- Jeffrey Goldberg, editor-in-chief of The Atlantic, was inadvertently included in a Signal group chat titled 'Houthi PC small group' with senior White House officials, including Pete Hegseth and Michael Waltz, discussing sensitive details of a planned US military mission targeting the Houthi group in Yemen.
- The incident, dubbed 'Signalgate,' occurred in the lead-up to airstrikes on March 15, raising concerns about the use of an unclassified commercial app, Signal, for high-stakes security-related communications, potentially circumventing federal laws on preserving government records.
- The Signal chat included detailed timings for aircraft launches related to the Houthi strike, information that some officials and experts believed could have endangered American pilots and personnel if it fell into the wrong hands, despite claims from the Trump administration that the information was not classified.
- President Trump dismissed the incident as 'really not a big deal' and a 'glitch,' while others, including former Secretary of State, expressed disbelief and a YouGov poll found that 74% of Americans considered the national security breach to be serious.
- Following the publication of The Atlantic's story, a Pentagon-wide advisory was issued against the usage of Signal, and a federal court ordered the Trump administration to preserve all Signal messages from March 11 to 15, highlighting the controversy's broader implications for national security protocols and the use of personal devices for official government communications.
Insights by Ground AI
Does this summary seem wrong?
16 Articles
16 Articles
All
Left
6
Center
4
Right
3
Coverage Details
Total News Sources16
Leaning Left6Leaning Right3Center4Last UpdatedBias Distribution46% Left
Bias Distribution
- 46% of the sources lean Left
46% Left
L 46%
C 31%
R 23%
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
Ownership
To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage