Supreme Court to weigh use of race in redistricting
- The U.S. Supreme Court will hear arguments regarding Louisiana's congressional districts, particularly the creation of two majority-Black districts due to a significant Black population.
- A group of Black voters claims the state's district map must comply with the Voting Rights Act, which requires representation of minority populations.
- The Callais litigants argue the map illegally relies on race, alleging it violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution.
- The Supreme Court's decision will influence how redistricting is conducted nationally, considering both the Voting Rights Act and the Equal Protection Clause's requirements.
41 Articles
41 Articles
Racial Gerrymanders Had a Bad Day at the Supreme Court
Supreme Court Grapples With Louisiana Voting Rights Act Case
The Supreme Court on March 24 grappled with a much-litigated racial gerrymandering case from Louisiana involving two consolidated cases: Louisiana v. Callais and Robinson v. Callais. Gerrymandering refers to the manipulation of electoral district boundaries to benefit a particular party or constituency. The case came after the Supreme Court in June 2023 struck down on a 5–4 vote Alabama’s electoral map for congressional elections, ruling that it…
Supreme Court Hears Oral Arguments in Key Redistricting Case
THE CENTER SQUARE—The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a critical case regarding Louisiana’s redrawn congressional districts on Monday. The state is defending the existing map and plaintiffs seek an overturn on grounds of racial gerrymander. The case could be pivotal as justices could examine the criteria required of state legislatures under the Voting Rights Act when it comes to balancing representation of minority groups with the dra…
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 38% of the sources lean Left, 38% of the sources are Center
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
Ownership
To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage