See every side of every news story
Published loading...Updated

UC Irvine Researchers Add some Clarity to Search for Extraterrestrial Life

ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, JUL 14 – Research reveals over 200 exoplanets are larger than previously measured, affecting estimates of Earth-like worlds and guiding future telescope observations, UC Irvine astronomers say.

  • On Monday, July 14, UC Irvine astronomers reported that over 200 exoplanets are likely larger than previously thought, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters.
  • Mixing of host and background stars causes TESS's low angular resolution to lead to underestimated planetary radii, causing measurement contamination.
  • Paul Robertson said, "We're basically measuring the shadow of the planet," while the team remeasured about 200 TESS-exoplanets with custom software, finding many are larger than previously thought.
  • Next, Te Han and his team plan to reexamine planets previously deemed uninhabitable, while Robertson cited the importance of prioritization for follow-up observations with the James Webb Space Telescope.
  • Implications suggest many exoplanets may be water worlds or gas giants, implying a reevaluation of habitability criteria for distant worlds.
Insights by Ground AI
Does this summary seem wrong?

13 Articles

tz.detz.de
+2 Reposted by 2 other sources
Center

Many exoplanets are larger than previously thought, a new study shows. This could have far-reaching consequences for the search for life in the universe.

Read Full Article
Think freely.Subscribe and get full access to Ground NewsSubscriptions start at $9.99/yearSubscribe

Bias Distribution

  • 100% of the sources are Center
100% Center
Factuality

To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium

Ownership

To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage

Phys.org broke the news in United Kingdom on Monday, July 14, 2025.
Sources are mostly out of (0)

Similar News Topics

You have read 1 out of your 5 free daily articles.

Join millions of well-informed readers who use Ground to compare coverage, check their news blindspots, and challenge their worldview.