Researchers Compare Malware Development in Rust vs C and C++

In Defense of C/C++ (Part 3) - Cybersecurity Magazine

In this third part of the series on secure programming in C and C++ I will be looking into some of the tooling available to help us create secure code in C and C++. The first article looked at the reasons why there has been a push away from C/C++, the second one investigated how

Researchers Compare Malware Development in Rust vs C and C++

Security researcher Nick Cerne from Bishop Fox has published findings comparing malware development in Rust versus traditional C/C++ languages. The research demonstrates how Rust provides inherent anti-analysis features that make malware more difficult to reverse engineer. According to Cerne’s analysis, languages like Rust, Go, and Nim have become increasingly popular among malware authors for two […] The post Researchers Compare Malware Develop…