Poilievre tells protesters he would scrap $90 billion Alto high-speed rail project
Poilievre called the $90 billion plan a "white elephant" and said Conservatives would scrap it as farmers warned it could block farm roads.
- On Wednesday, Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre addressed protesters, vowing his party would cancel the $90 billion Alto high-speed rail project, which he called a "white elephant."
- The proposed Alto route would connect Toronto to Quebec City with stops in Ottawa, Montreal, and Laval, but faces opposition from farmers concerned about disrupted land access.
- Protesters in Ottawa chanted "No Alto!" while farmers travelled to the capital to warn the line would cut off access to their farm roads.
- Transport Minister Steven MacKinnon said Canada will proceed with "great sensitivity and respect" for farmers and will consult with communities until a precise route is chosen.
- Whether the Alto project proceeds remains uncertain as the government balances national transit goals against significant local opposition from affected communities.
21 Articles
21 Articles
Farmers in the eastern part of the province expressed dissatisfaction with the high-speed train project.
‘We don’t want to re-live that history’: Quebec farmers protest high-speed train project
Quebec and Ontario farmers met up on the Alexandra bridge linking their two provinces before marching to Parliament Hill Wednesday, as they joined forces against a high-speed train.
‘Can you imagine the stress?’: Protest against high-speed rail project hits Ottawa
Protesters chanted "No Alto!" as they marched past the Prime Minister's Office on Parliament Hill Wednesday to register their opposition to the Alto high-speed rail project.
Email to the Editor: Core priorities before Alto
The Liberal government has announced ambitious high-speed rail projects connecting Ontario and Quebec. While modern transportation infrastructure is important, Canadians must ask whether this project represents the best use of public resources at a time when so many urgent challenges remain unresolved. These rail plans could require the expropriation of private land, placing significant burdens on farming communities, rural landowners, and local…
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 67% of the sources lean Left
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium













