, after the Supreme Court ruling. This was announced by the owners, who also defended the ownership of the land and questioned that the constructions should be classified as a “toma vip”. Let’s remember that on October 27, the Supreme Court rejected the remedy of protection presented by the owner of the modular cabins located ... Continue reading “owners of huts installed in Pucón’s wetland must withdraw them in 45 days: they deny being “toma VI…
, after the Supreme Court ruling. This was announced by the owners, who also defended the ownership of the land and questioned that the constructions should be classified as a “toma vip”. Let’s remember that on October 27, the Supreme Court rejected the remedy of protection presented by the owner of the modular cabins located ... Continue reading “owners of huts installed in Pucón’s wetland must withdraw them in 45 days: they deny being “toma VI…