US EditionNew York Times Exposé Vindicates CCHR: ADHD Isn’t Biological, Says Watchdog
- A recent *New York Times Magazine* exposé questions ADHD's scientific basis, impacting mental health discussions.
- ADHD was marketed as a neurobiological disorder needing drugs, despite the lack of objective testing.
- The exposé reveals over 3.4 million American children received an ADHD label and stimulants.
- After decades of research, Swanson stated, "I don’t agree with people who say that stimulant treatment is good."
- Experts now retreat from the biological basis, prompting a federal review of medication practices and overuse.
13 Articles
13 Articles
Daily Journal
New York Times Exposé Vindicates CCHR: ADHD Isn’t Biological, Says Watchdog
LOS ANGELES, Calif., April 21, 2025 (SEND2PRESS NEWSWIRE) — A recent exposé in The New York Times Magazine will send shockwaves through the psychiatric community, affirming what the Citizens Commission on Human Rights International (CCHR) has warned for decades: there…
New York Times Exposé Vindicates CCHR: ADHD Isn't Biological, Says Watchdog - Send2Press Newswire
LOS ANGELES, Calif., April 21, 2025 (SEND2PRESS NEWSWIRE) -- A recent exposé in The New York Times Magazine will send shockwaves through the psychiatric community, affirming what the Citizens Commission on Human Rights International (CCHR) has warned for decades: there is no medical proof that Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a biological disorder. Yet, over 3.4 million American children are labeled with ADHD and prescribed pow…
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 50% of the sources are Center
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
Ownership
To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage
