Mortgages — Disparate treatment

Michigan Lawyers Weekly

Mortgages — Disparate treatment

Where a judge ruled in favor of the defendants in a dispute arising from the foreclosure of real property, that judgment should be upheld despite the plaintiffs’ argument that the judge erroneously held that they failed to establish disparate treatment claims under the Fair Housing Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act and that the judge erroneously relied on the affidavit of a bank employee as substantive evidence at trial. The post Mortgage…