US EditionMortgages — Disparate treatment
Summary by Michigan Lawyers Weekly
This story is only covered by news sources that have yet to be evaluated by the independent media monitoring agencies we use to assess the quality and reliability of news outlets on our platform. Learn more here.1 Articles
1 Articles
All
Left
Center
Right
Mortgages — Disparate treatment
Where a judge ruled in favor of the defendants in a dispute arising from the foreclosure of real property, that judgment should be upheld despite the plaintiffs’ argument that the judge erroneously held that they failed to establish disparate treatment claims under the Fair Housing Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act and that the judge erroneously relied on the affidavit of a bank employee as substantive evidence at trial. The post Mortgage…
Coverage Details
Total News Sources1
Leaning Left0Leaning Right0Center0Last UpdatedBias DistributionNo sources with tracked biases.
Bias Distribution
- There is no tracked Bias information for the sources covering this story.
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
Ownership
To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage
