US EditionMigrants in hotels for up to three years, report suggests
- Migrants might remain in hotels for up to three more years due to the asylum backlog, as reported by The Times.
- Home Secretary Yvette Cooper acknowledged that clearing the backlog will take longer than previously expected.
- The Labour manifesto promises to restore order to the asylum system and hire additional caseworkers to address the backlog.
14 Articles
14 Articles
Migrants Will Be Housed in Hotels for Three More Years, British Labour Government Says
Labour’s pledge to “restore order” to the asylum system—and, most significantly, to “end asylum hotels, saving the taxpayer billions of pounds”—won’t be implemented for up to three years, if not more. A government source yesterday told The Times that the asylum backlog is “much worse than we thought,” meaning “it’s going to take a lot longer to clear than we anticipated.” This is despite Labour’s insistence ahead of the election that it would no…
British taxpayers have received bad news. Immigrants arriving via the English Channel will be accommodated in state-owned hotels, i.e. at their expense, for approximately another three years. It will probably take a long time to settle the fate of the refugees, and approx. The majority of 30,000 migrants stay in hotels, and their care costs more than 4 million pounds (approx. 2 billion forints) per day.
Migrants could be in taxpayer-funded hotels for another THREE YEARS due to backlog
Migrants could be staying in taxpayer-funded hotels for as many as three more years thanks to an uncleared "asylum backlog" - despite Labour's pledge to "restore order to the system".Across 250 British hotels, some 30,000 migrants are being put up at Britons' expense - to the tune of £4.2million every day.That sits alongside a further 61,778 in "dispersal accommodation" - smaller private accommodation across the country or former university stud…
The Telegraph
Daily ExpressMigrants could be in hotels for three more years due to backlog
Government claims asylum queue is ‘much worse than we thought’
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 46% of the sources lean Right
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
