See every side of every news story
Published loading...Updated

Michigan court hears arguments in case seeking to shut down Enbridge's Line 5

  • On Monday, attorneys for the Michigan Department of Attorney General presented arguments to Judge James S. Jamo in the case of Nessell v. Enbridge, aiming to shut down Line 5 in the Straits of Mackinac.
  • The Department argued that the 1953 easement for Line 5 is invalid, violating the public trust doctrine and the Michigan Environmental Protection Act.
  • Enbridge's attorney claimed that federal regulators have sole authority over pipeline safety, citing a 1977 treaty with Canada as a barrier to state regulation.
  • Judge Jamo will issue a written opinion after hearing arguments, which could significantly affect Michigan tribes with interests in the Straits of Mackinac.
Insights by Ground AI
Does this summary seem wrong?

8 Articles

All
Left
3
Center
2
Right
2
Think freely.Subscribe and get full access to Ground NewsSubscriptions start at $9.99/yearSubscribe

Bias Distribution

  • 43% of the sources lean Left
43% Left
Factuality

To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium

Ownership

To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage

Wisconsin Public Radio broke the news in Madison, United States on Tuesday, January 28, 2025.
Sources are mostly out of (0)