Michigan court hears arguments in case seeking to shut down Enbridge's Line 5
- On Monday, attorneys for the Michigan Department of Attorney General presented arguments to Judge James S. Jamo in the case of Nessell v. Enbridge, aiming to shut down Line 5 in the Straits of Mackinac.
- The Department argued that the 1953 easement for Line 5 is invalid, violating the public trust doctrine and the Michigan Environmental Protection Act.
- Enbridge's attorney claimed that federal regulators have sole authority over pipeline safety, citing a 1977 treaty with Canada as a barrier to state regulation.
- Judge Jamo will issue a written opinion after hearing arguments, which could significantly affect Michigan tribes with interests in the Straits of Mackinac.
Insights by Ground AI
Does this summary seem wrong?
8 Articles
8 Articles
All
Left
3
Center
2
Right
2
Coverage Details
Total News Sources8
Leaning Left3Leaning Right2Center2Last UpdatedBias Distribution43% Left
Bias Distribution
- 43% of the sources lean Left
43% Left
L 43%
C 29%
R 29%
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
Ownership
To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage