US Edition'Insane Adivasi' Remark: How the Court Failed to Grasp the Deeper Prejudice Against Oppressed Communities
4 Articles
4 Articles
'Insane Adivasi' Remark: How the Court Failed to Grasp the Deeper Prejudice Against Oppressed Communities
The problem arises when institutions, even the courts, fail to differentiate between the pride in self-identification as Adivasi and the prejudice, unconstitutional vocabulary attached to its use by others.
The Hamburg Constitutional Court rejected the request for a popular initiative against gender language in administration and education as inadmissible.
The Hamburg Constitutional Court has rejected all applications for an anti-gender initiative, which has also brought an interim order to an end. The decisions were unanimous.
The Hamburg Constitutional Court has rejected the applications of the popular initiative "Ending Gender Language in Administration and Education." The initiative had filed a lawsuit against the Senate and the Hamburg Parliament for declaring the referendum invalid in the summer of 2024. The court ruled that the lawsuits were inadmissible. The popular initiative had objected to the fact that the referendum took place during the holiday season and…
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 67% of the sources lean Left
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
