Justice Department says law requiring president to turn over records at end of administration is unconstitutional
The opinion says the Presidential Records Act is unconstitutional and could let Trump keep documents, raising the prospect of legal challenges.
- The Department of Justice issued a legal opinion Wednesday declaring the Presidential Records Act of 1978 unconstitutional, concluding President Trump need not transfer official records to the National Archives when leaving office.
- This finding follows Trump's previous legal battles, including his 2023 indictment for allegedly retaining classified materials at his Mar-a-Lago estate, a case Judge Aileen Cannon dismissed in 2024.
- T. Elliot Gaiser, who signed the 52-page opinion, argued the law "exceeds Congress' powers" and infringes on the executive branch's constitutional autonomy, effectively shielding presidential decision-making from legislative oversight.
- White House officials denied the administration plans to destroy files, stating President Trump remains "committed to preserving records" for historical value and litigation needs, despite critics warning of a dangerous precedent.
- The DOJ opinion does not set law, leaving the administration to weigh whether to seek legislative changes or defend the stance in court while facing legal challenges over government accountability.
20 Articles
20 Articles
DOJ says presidential records law is unconstitutional, Trump not bound
The Justice Department has concluded that the Presidential Records Act is unconstitutional. It’s a finding that will allow President Donald Trump to ignore a law that has governed presidential records for nearly five decades. The opinion from the department’s Office of Legal Counsel states that Congress lacks the authority to require the president to preserve and turn over official records to the National Archives. The finding, first reported by…
DoJ Claims Presidential Records Act Is 'Unconstitutional'
The Justice Department contends that a federal law requiring the preservation of presidential records is unconstitutional, which could effectively permit White House lawyers to try to set their own voluntary presidential recordkeeping policy and, potentially, upend decades-old legal precedent established in response to Richard M. Nixon’s effort to keep control of records after his resignation. The Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel — w…
Justice Department Says the Presidential Records Act Is Unconstitutional
The Justice Department issued an opinion this week declaring the Presidential Records Act unconstitutional. Rahmat Gul/APThe Department of Justice has determined that the decades-old Presidential Records Act is unconstitutional, a decision that could allow the White House to create its own system to choose which records must be retained after President Donald Trump leaves office.The department’s Office of Legal Counsel issued a 52-page opinion e…
American Oversight Slams Trump’s Attempted Evasion of Presidential Records Act
In response to the Department of Justice’s Office of Legal Counsel claiming the Presidential Records Act (PRA) is unconstitutional and that Donald Trump doesn’t need to follow the law — effectively shielding his administration’s records from public disclosure — American Oversight criticized the Trump White House’s continued efforts to evade transparency obligations, despite repeated claims from the president and his team that he is “the most tra…
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 58% of the sources lean Left
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium















