Bgh Ruling Against Höcke: Reader's Debate on the Rule of Law and Freedom of Expression
23 Articles
23 Articles
Two judgments against the AfD politician Höcke for the use of NS-paroles are legally binding.
Twice the Thuringian AfD chief was found guilty at the Landgericht Halle in 2024 because of the use of a Nazi parole. Both times rightly - say now Germany's highest criminal judge.
The BGH ruling against AfD-Mann Höcke provides for controversial debates. Readers discuss the rule of law, freedom of expression and political motives. The most important perspectives.
Björn Höcke was finally convicted of a Nazi parole. The BGH confirmed fines of a total of 29,900 euros.
The Bundesgerichtshof rejects the revisions of the AfD-Landeschef Höcke against judgments of the Landgericht Halle. It is about its use of the SA-parole "Everything for Germany". For him, the decision on the determination of penalties in future proceedings can have significant consequences.
The Bundesgerichtshof confirmed two judgments against Björn Höcke. The Thuringian AfD faction leader had used a forbidden SA solution several times and had therefore been sentenced to fines.[more]]>
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 45% of the sources are Center
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium