Israeli parliament passes law expanding political control of judicial appointments
- Israel's parliament passed a law increasing officials' authority to appoint judges, with a vote of 67 in favor and one against, despite opposition boycott.
- The legislation is part of Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu's judicial reforms, which have triggered significant protests since 2023.
- Critics argue that the reforms could lead to authoritarianism and undermine judicial independence, particularly during Netanyahu's corruption trial.
- The law alters the Judicial Selection Committee by removing two representatives from the Israel Bar Association and modifying the appointment process for judicial roles.
178 Articles
178 Articles
Israeli Lawmakers Call on Australian Counterparts to Reject Two-State Solution
Australian Member of Parliament Andrew Wallace. Photo: Screenshot A group of Israeli politicians has called on Australian Members of Parliament to reject their country’s support for a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict ahead of the upcoming Australian federal election. In a letter signed by eight members from both governing coalition and opposition parties in the Knesset (Israeli parliament), lawmakers raised concerns about t…
In Israel, increased politicization of the judiciary
The Knesset has adopted a law that strengthens the influence of the executive in the process of appointing judges. This law is incorporated into the work of the rule of law and the principle of separation of powers begun two years ago by the government of Benyamin Netanyahu.
Judges cannot act by slogan, except now that they will be elected: Yasmin Esquivel
Judges cannot act through economic or political slogans, “less now that they will be elected by the citizenry,” said Yasmín Esquivel Mossa, Minister of the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation (SCJN). By participating as a special guest in the event “Lawyers 2025”, which recognizes leadership in the legal sphere, the minister pointed out that judicial reform has generated a lot of concern, perhaps the main concern for impartiality in the rule …
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 38% of the sources lean Right
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
Ownership
To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage