Don't Just Read the News, Understand It.
Published loading...Updated

Is Donald Trump’s ‘big, beautiful bill’ a political curse for Republicans?

  • On Tuesday, the Senate passed Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act with Vice-President JD Vance casting the tie-breaking vote in Washington, D.C.
  • The bill’s passage followed intense debate over its $4.5 trillion in tax cuts, spending cuts to Medicaid, and a projected $3.4 trillion increase in federal deficits over ten years.
  • The 1,038-page legislation contains hundreds of provisions, including funding for immigration enforcement, defense, and tax breaks, while drawing criticism for weakening federal judges' powers.
  • Rep. Maxwell Alejandro Frost criticized Republicans for identifying as 'pro-life' while failing to address gun violence, arguing that claiming to protect life means little if children are still at risk of being shot.
  • The bill now returns to the House, where Speaker Mike Johnson seeks to convince holdouts before the July 4 deadline, but opposition from hardliners and Democrats leaves the outcome uncertain.
Insights by Ground AI
Does this summary seem wrong?

44 Articles

All
Left
13
Center
6
Right
8
KAKE NewsKAKE News
+11 Reposted by 11 other sources
Center

Why some Republicans say 'big, beautiful bill' will only cost $441 billion by 2034

(The Center Square) – Republicans’ “big, beautiful bill” is under fire from budget watchdogs for permanently extending the bulk of the expiring 2017 tax cuts, a move that puts the total cost of the bill at $4.5 trillion and would…

Read Full Article
Think freely.Subscribe and get full access to Ground NewsSubscriptions start at $9.99/yearSubscribe

Bias Distribution

  • 48% of the sources lean Left
48% Left
Factuality

To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium

Ownership

To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage

America First Report broke the news in on Tuesday, July 1, 2025.
Sources are mostly out of (0)

You have read 1 out of your 5 free daily articles.

Join millions of well-informed readers who use Ground to compare coverage, check their news blindspots, and challenge their worldview.