Skip to main content
Discover what's not being covered
Published • loading... • Updated

In fact-check post, Election Commission rejects Rahul's Form 6 claim as 'misleading'

  • On Monday, October 5, the Supreme Court issued notices to the Election Commission and the Centre on petitions challenging Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar's alleged unilateral decision-making, though the bench declined to suspend him pending responses.
  • Petitions filed by Rakesh Kumar Singh and Shailendra Mani Tripathi allege that Chief Election Commissioner Kumar bypassed mandatory collective decision-making for the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls, seeking to preserve the Election Commission's multi-member character.
  • The Supreme Court clarified it never approved modifications to Form 6, contradicting earlier Election Commission claims, while Election Commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi reportedly recorded 14 formal objections over 10 months regarding unilateral actions.
  • Refusing to suspend Chief Election Commissioner Kumar, the bench of Chief Justice Surya Kant, Justice Joymalya Bagchi, and Justice V Mohana stated it would annul any decisions found to lack unanimity after examining official records.
  • Protests calling for Kumar's resignation continue across India, as the court's scrutiny into the commission's institutional credibility addresses concerns regarding alleged voter disenfranchisement and the integrity of electoral processes.
Insights by Ground AI

112 Articles

Think freely.Subscribe and get full access to Ground NewsSubscriptions start at $9.99/yearSubscribe

Bias Distribution

  • 50% of the sources lean Right
50% Right

Factuality Info Icon

To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium

Ownership

Info Icon

To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage

India TV Hindi Hindi broke the news on Thursday, October 1, 2026.
Too Big Arrow Icon
Sources are mostly out of (0)

Similar News Topics

News
Feed Dots Icon
For You
Search Icon
Search
Blindspot LogoBlindspotLocal