Elad v. NCAA – Former JUCO Player Demonstrates Likelihood of Success in Antitrust Suit Challenging NCAA’s JUCO Rule

Elad v. NCAA – Former JUCO Player Demonstrates Likelihood of Success in Antitrust Suit Challenging NCAA’s JUCO Rule

On April 25, U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi ordered the NCAA not to enforce its Five-Year Rule against Rutgers University cornerback Jett Elad.[1] The impact of name, image, and likeness (NIL) agreements on the new world of Division I sports underpinned two key findings in the opinion: (1) the NCAA’s junior college rule (JUCO Rule) is subject to federal antitrust laws; and, (2) Elad had a likelihood of success on the merits because Divisi…

House v. NCAA Settlement Has a Federal Lobbying Provision

The provision aims to ensure plaintiffs’ lawyers won’t disrupt the federal lobbying campaign the NCAA has waged to protect amateurism.

House Settlement Approved by NCAA Division I Board, On Hold in Federal Court Over Roster Limit Concerns

The NCAA Division I Board of Directors approved the House settlement as an addition to the organization’s rule book last The post House Settlement Approved by NCAA Division I Board, On Hold in Federal Court Over Roster Limit Concerns appeared first on College Gym News.