He Was Gambling, but His Wife Was Found at Fault! Landmark Divorce Ruling From the Supreme Court.
This story is only covered by news sources that have yet to be evaluated by the independent media monitoring agencies we use to assess the quality and reliability of news outlets on our platform. Learn more here.3 Articles
3 Articles
In a divorce case filed after 43 years of marriage, the Supreme Court's General Assembly of Civil Law delivered the final verdict. The Assembly found the husband, who failed to pay his debts by gambling, to be less at fault, while the wife, who refused to receive guests at home, constantly changed furniture, and insulted her husband, was found to be more at fault.
The Supreme Court's General Assembly of Civil Law, putting an end to a years-long divorce case, found the husband, who failed to pay his debts by gambling, to be less at fault, while the wife, who refused to receive guests at home, constantly changed furniture, and insulted her husband, was found to be more at fault. The Assembly ruled that the wife, who called her husband "stupid" and "mentally retarded," must pay material and moral damages.
The Supreme Court's General Assembly of Civil Law, putting an end to a years-long divorce case, found the husband, who failed to pay his debts by gambling, to be less at fault, while the wife, who refused to receive guests at home, constantly changed furniture, and insulted her husband, was found to be more at fault.
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- There is no tracked Bias information for the sources covering this story.
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
