Georgia Supreme Court considers whether judge was right to block new election rules
- The Georgia Supreme Court heard arguments on whether the State Election Board had the authority to enact seven controversial rules just before the 2024 general election, which were challenged by various parties including Eternal Vigilance Action and the Georgia Republican Party.
- Fulton County Superior Court Judge Thomas Cox ruled the seven rules illegal and unconstitutional, stating that the State Election Board lacked authority as the General Assembly had not provided clear guidelines for rulemaking.
- Critics argued that the rules could undermine election integrity and create delays in election results, while supporters claimed they would strengthen trustworthiness and accuracy in elections; the court's decision could significantly impact the State Election Board's future powers.
- The ruling will affect whether the State Election Board can change election rules again, potentially resuming efforts to implement stricter vote-counting requirements or limiting its role in addressing election fraud.
- The Georgia Supreme Court's decision on these rules will have significant implications for how elections are conducted in Georgia.
10 Articles
10 Articles
Georgia Supreme Court takes up State Election Board rules changes
ATLANTA – Lawyers representing civil rights and voting rights groups asked the Georgia Supreme Court Wednesday to uphold a lower-court ruling that invalidated seven controversial changes to state election laws the Republican-controlled State Election Board (SEB) adopted last fall.

Georgia Supreme Court considers whether judge was right to block new election rules
Just before last year's general election, a judge in Georgia blocked seven new rules passed by the State Election Board and said the board didn't have the authority to pass them.
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 67% of the sources lean Left
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
Ownership
To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage