US EditionCIT declines short-term halt for IEEPA tariffs, finding no ‘irreparable harm’
- The U.S. International Trade Court denied a request from five small businesses to block President Donald Trump's tariffs, stating they did not show 'immediate and irreparable harm' from the tariffs imposed on April 2.
- The plaintiffs argued that the tariffs could harm their reputation and goodwill to customers by forcing them to raise prices on imported goods.
- A hearing on the broader legal challenge regarding the tariffs is scheduled for May 13, continuing the debate on their legality.
- The Trump administration's tariffs intend to address trade imbalances and enhance national security, yet the plaintiffs contend that the trade deficit does not justify such extreme measures.
18 Articles
18 Articles
CIT declines short-term halt for IEEPA tariffs, finding no ‘irreparable harm’
Judges on the Court of International Trade have declined to immediately halt the implementation of President Trump’s International Emergency Economic Powers Act tariffs, asking for further briefings and scheduling a May 13 hearing on whether to block the duties over the long term. A three-judge CIT panel issued an order late on April 22 rejecting small-business plaintiffs’ request for a temporary restraining order against the IEEPA tariffs. Howe…
US International Trade Court Denies Companies’ Bid to Block Trump’s Tariffs
The U.S. International Trade Court on April 22 denied a request by five U.S. small businesses to block President Donald Trump’s decision to impose tariffs on nearly all countries. Liberty Justice Center filed the request on April 18 on behalf of the five owner-operated businesses that rely on imports, seeking a temporary restraining order to block the tariffs, which they alleged were unlawful. In a brief two-page order, the court’s three-judge p…
US Court of International Trade sides with Trump in tariff case
In a win for the Trump administration, the U.S. Court of International Trade rejected a request from a group of small businesses to immediately halt President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs from taking force.Judges on the three-member panel for the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) ruled that the plaintiffs failed to show a likelihood that they would suffer "immediate and irreparable harm" as a result of the tariffs – the standard courts …
U.S. Court rejects immediate cessation of Trump's tariffs
President Donald Trump's sweeping tariff plan faces legal opposition from small business owners seeking immediate relief from newly imposed import taxes. According to Fox Business, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) has rejected a request from small businesses to temporarily halt Trump's extensive tariff implementation, dealing a significant legal victory to the administration. The three-judge panel determined that the plaintiffs, repre…
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 80% of the sources lean Right
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
Ownership
To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage
