Attorneys general file brief to US Supreme Court supporting Maryland county’s LGBTQ book curriculum
- A coalition of 19 attorneys general filed an amicus brief with the US Supreme Court supporting a Maryland county's LGBTQ-inclusive book policy for schools without an opt-out option for parents.
- The attorneys general asserted that the policy promotes a safe learning environment and falls within schools' authority to do so.
- They stated that the policy does not infringe on parents' rights under the First Amendment, as exposure to LGBTQ-inclusive books does not interfere with religious beliefs.
- The Supreme Court will hear the case on April 22, addressing claims from parents challenging the school district's curriculum.
3 Articles
3 Articles
Attorneys general file brief to US Supreme Court supporting Maryland county’s LGBTQ book curriculum
A coalition of 19 attorneys general filed a 31-page amicus brief with the US Supreme Court on Wednesday, claiming a Maryland county’s policy of incorporating LGBTQ-inclusive books into their curriculum with no opt-out option for parents does not violate the US Constitution. The amicus brief asserted that the use of LGBTQ-inclusive books in the school district’s curriculum without an opt-out option, a policy adopted by the Montgomery County Board…
FFRF files Supreme Court amicus brief defending LGBTQ-inclusive book curriculum
The Freedom From Religion Foundation has filed a friend-of-the-court brief before the U.S. Supreme Court in defense of more inclusive readings in a Maryland school district. The case stems from religious objections by parents to a few LGBTQ-themed books being included in their children’s elementary-school reading list. A range of storybooks on the reading list are offered for reading as part of regular language-arts instruction. “The Supreme Cou…
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 100% of the sources lean Left
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
Ownership
To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage