Published • loading... • Updated
Ex parte Baurin and the Anti-Harassment Rationale for Double Patenting
Summary by patentlyo.com
This story is only covered by news sources that have yet to be evaluated by the independent media monitoring agencies we use to assess the quality and reliability of news outlets on our platform. Learn more here.2 Articles
2 Articles
USPTO designates as precedential an Appeals Review Panel decision addressing obviousness-type double patenting
Patent Trial and Appeal Board USPTO designates as precedential an Appeals Review Panel decision addressing obviousness-type double patenting Ex parte Baurin, Appeal 2024-002920 (ARP Aug. 6, 2026) (precedential) In this decision, an Appeals Review Pa…
Ex parte Baurin and the Anti-Harassment Rationale for Double Patenting
by Dennis Crouch Director John Squires has issued another precedential decision, this time focusing on obviousness-type double patenting (ODP). In Ex parte Baurin, Appeal No. 2024-002920 (ARP Aug. 6, 2026), an Appeals Review Panel led by Director Squires (joined by Chief Administrative Patent Judge Deshpande and Acting Deputy Chief Judge Ankenbrand) reversed the Board and reinstated six ODP rejections of Sanofi antibody claims. The panel held th…
Coverage Details
Total News Sources2
Leaning Left0Leaning Right0Center0Last UpdatedBias DistributionNo sources with tracked biases.
Bias Distribution
- There is no tracked Bias information for the sources covering this story.
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
