Encyclopedia Britannica sues OpenAI over AI training
Encyclopaedia Britannica and Merriam-Webster accuse OpenAI of copying nearly 100,000 articles to train ChatGPT, seeking damages and an injunction for copyright and trademark infringement.
- On Friday, Encyclopaedia Britannica and its Merriam-Webster subsidiary filed a lawsuit against OpenAI in Manhattan federal court, alleging the AI giant misused their reference materials to train its artificial intelligence models without permission.
- The complaint alleges OpenAI used nearly 100,000 online articles for its flagship chatbot, ChatGPT, generating AI summaries that 'cannibalized' Britannica's web traffic by diverting users from the publisher's websites.
- Beyond copyright claims, Britannica alleges OpenAI violates the Lanham Act through false hallucinations, while arguing the firm takes a 'free ride' on 'trusted' content, starving it of crucial advertising revenue.
- An OpenAI spokesperson defended the practice on Monday, asserting that 'our models empower innovation' and are trained on publicly available data grounded in fair use standards.
- This litigation joins a growing wave of lawsuits from news outlets and authors against tech companies, though legal precedents remain uncertain whether training large language models on copyrighted content constitutes infringement.
62 Articles
62 Articles
Encyclopedia Britannica, Merriam-Webster sue OpenAI over ‘Massive Copyright Infringement’
Encyclopedia Britannica and its Merriam-Webster subsidiary filed suit against OpenAI on Friday, accusing the artificial intelligence giant of unlawfully copying nearly 100,000 copyrighted articles to train its GPT large language models.
Encyclopedia Britannica sues artificial intelligence for stealing content | chatgpt | openAI | AI | encyclopedia | web traffic
Encyclopaedia Britannica takes on OpenAI
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 43% of the sources lean Left
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium






















