ECI rejects claim of unilateral decisions by CEC, says key SIR orders were unanimous
The commission said the three SIR orders were approved unanimously and rejected claims that Form 6 was amended, as the Supreme Court weighs multiple petitions.
- On Monday, the Election Commission of India filed a nearly 250-page affidavit in the Supreme Court, asserting that all three Special Intensive Revision orders were unanimously approved by Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar and both Election Commissioners.
- Rejecting allegations that it amended statutory Form 6, the ECI stated the additional declaration introduced for SIR was a separate document intended to facilitate eligibility verification through a "mapping" concept.
- The affidavit confirmed a controversial July 28 office order regarding internal work allocation was "never implemented" following a joint direction by both Election Commissioners, while clarifying that internal file notes do not constitute final decisions.
- Granting 10 days to petitioners to respond, the Supreme Court deferred the hearing on SIR challenges until November 17, allowing time for legal examination of the ECI's affidavit.
- Petitions from Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi and other INDIA bloc leaders allege arbitrary decision-making and alleged "vote chori" during the revision process, prompting nationwide protests and demands for an SIT probe.
70 Articles
70 Articles
ECI rejects claim of unilateral decisions by CEC, says key SIR orders were unanimous
It asserted that its key Special Intensive Revision (SIR) orders were unanimously approved, that it had not amended Form 6, and that, in urgent matters, the concurrence of members could be obtained electronically and formally recorded on file subsequently.
CEC Gyanesh Kumar didn't bypass colleagues on SIR: ECI to SC
NEW DELHI: The Election Commission of India has rejected allegations that Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar took decisions concerning the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) without the approval of his two fellow Commissioners. In a counter-affidavit filed before the Supreme Court on October 26, the poll body maintained that all three SIR orders were approved unanimously. The affidavit was filed by Deputy Election Commissioner Bhanu Prakash…
ECI Tells SC SIR Decisions Were Unanimous, Denies Amending Form 6
Get latest articles and stories on India at LatestLY. The Election Commission of India (ECI) on Monday told the Supreme Court that all three orders concerning the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls were taken unanimously by the Commission, while denying that it amended Form 6 through the SIR orders. India News | ECI Tells SC SIR Decisions Were Unanimous, Denies Amending Form 6.
SIR controversy: Election Commission says all three members approved orders, denies amending Form 6
In its counter-affidavit filed before the apex court, the poll panel said the SIR orders issued on June 24, 2025, October 27, 2025, and May 14, 2026, were approved unanimously by Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) Gyanesh Kumar and Election Commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi.
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 58% of the sources lean Right
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
























