Do the Supreme Court "Shadow Papers" Reveal Supreme Court Hypocrisy?
Baude and Re say critics conflate legal standards and that the justices used the normal equitable test for an emergency stay.
4 Articles
4 Articles
Behind closed doors: How the Supreme Court secretly fast-tracks Trump's agenda
The recent publication of confidential Supreme Court memoranda by The New York Times has brought to light a pivotal moment in the court’s history. “The birth of the Supreme Court’s shadow docket has long been a mystery,” wrote reporters Jodi Kantor and Adam Liptak. “Until now.”Originally coined by legal scholar William Baude, the term “shadow docket” refers to the Supreme Court’s emergency docket, which, as Baude wrote, includes “a range of orde…
How the Supreme Court’s ‘Shadow Docket’ Brings Hasty Decisions With Long‑Lasting Implications
Republished with permission from The Conversation, by Wayne Unger, Quinnipiac University The recent publication of confidential Supreme Court memoranda by The New York Times has brought to light a pivotal moment in the court’s history. “The birth of the Supreme Court’s shadow docket has long been a mystery,” wrote reporters Jodi Kantor and Adam Liptak. “Until now.” Originally coined by legal scholar William Baude, the term “shadow docket” refers…
Supreme Court’s ‘shadow docket’ brings hasty decisions with long‑lasting implications, outside of its usual careful deliberation
by Wayne Unger, Quinnipiac University, [This article first appeared in The Conversation, republished with permission] The recent publication of confidential Supreme Court memoranda by The New York Times has brought to light a pivotal moment in the court’s history. “The birth of the Supreme Court’s shadow docket has long been a mystery,” wrote reporters Jodi Kantor and Adam Liptak. “Until now.” Originally coined by legal scholar William Baude, th…
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 67% of the sources lean Left
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium

