Federal judge will hear arguments as groups try to block Trump's executive order on elections
- A federal judge will hear arguments on President Donald Trump’s executive order on elections, which requires proof of citizenship to register to vote in federal elections.
- The Democratic National Committee and several voting rights groups argue that Trump's order is unconstitutional and illegal.
- The plaintiffs assert that Trump’s order is illegal because it claims power over an independent agency that he does not possess.
- U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly will consider requests for a preliminary injunction to temporarily block the executive order during the lawsuits.
64 Articles
64 Articles
Core Democratic groups preparing to be targeted
NEW YORK — As President Donald Trump pushes the historical boundaries of executive power, some of the Democratic Party's core political institutions are preparing for the possibility that the federal government may soon launch criminal investigations against them.
Administration’s Dubious Trustworthiness Permeates Hearing On Trump Election Order
A cagey Trump administration arrived at court Thursday, where a judge presided over the early stages of a lawsuit stemming from a March executive order mandating that proof of citizenship be added to federal voting forms.
Military families challenge Trump’s stricter federal voting rules
An organization that advocates for military voters argues a new executive order would add barriers for troops and families who vote by absentee ballot.
Voting rights groups head to court to challenge Trump's order on elections
A federal judge on Thursday will hear arguments in three cases from national Democrats and voting rights groups that are challenging President Donald Trump’s recent executive order on elections, ...
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 67% of the sources are Center
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium

















