US EditionCsm Declares "Institutional Ambiguity" and "the Absence of a Legal Basis" on the Committee of Government for Justice Laws
4 Articles
4 Articles
The judges of the Supreme Council of the Magistrates attack the Government again, this time for the way it was established at the initiative of Prime Minister Bolojan, the committee that should propose new amendments to the laws of justice,...
The section for judges of the Supreme Court of Justice (CSM) states that the government's discussions on the matter of the review committee in the field of justice "did not answer the legitimate and essential questions concerning the Committee's real objective, its functioning and its legitimacy". In addition, the judges claim that the discussions were on administrative matters, outside the powers established by the body's establishment decision…
After attending a meeting to assess the usefulness and purpose of this demersal, the representatives of the CSM shall transmit that the discussions presented did not answer legitimate and essential questions regarding the Committee's real objective, its functioning and its legitimacy.
After sending representatives to the Government's discussions on reform of justice, the CSM accused "the lack of transparency" and the ambiguity of the way the Committee was designated and the proposals made.
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 50% of the sources lean Left, 50% of the sources are Center
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
