Editorial: The Second Amendment Protects Ammo, Too
CALIFORNIA, UNITED STATES, JUL 27 – The Ninth Circuit found California's ammo background check law unconstitutional as it restricts access to ammunition, a necessary component for operable firearms, ruling lacks historical precedent.
- A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit struck down California’s ammunition background check law, ruling it violates the Second Amendment.
- Using the NYSRPA v. Bruen framework, the panel evaluated California’s ammunition law, finding no historical analogues for such restrictions in the 18th or 19th centuries.
- The appellate panel noted the law requires a background check before each ammunition purchase and in-person transactions only, limiting gun owners’ ability to keep firearms operable.
- State officials have two weeks to request a full Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals review, and California Department of Justice said `we are looking into our legal options`.
- Pending Supreme Court review, the decision marks another reversal of state firearm regulations, adding to earlier this month rulings on gun laws.
15 Articles
15 Articles

Editorial: The Second Amendment protects ammo, too
On the Shawn Ryan podcast July 14, Gov. Gavin Newsom insisted he supported the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms. He even accepted a gift Sig Sauer P365 XMACRO pistol. “This is fabulous,” the governor said. “I’m not anti-gun at all. I’m just for gun safety, common sense. The vast majority of folks on the right and the left agree.” That’s one way to frame things. Over the years, Newsom has backed numerous gun-control laws in this state…


An Official Journal Of The NRA | Ninth Circuit Strikes Down California’s Background Check Requirement for Ammo Purchases in NRA Backed Case
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that California’s law requiring a background check for each ammunition purchase violates the Second Amendment in Rhode v. Bonta—a case backed by the National Rifle Association and California Rifle and Pistol Association.

‘On a roll’: Ammo decision fuels winning streak for gun rights in California
A federal appeals court this week struck down California’s landmark law requiring background checks and in-person transactions for ammunition purchases, the latest in a string of judicial wins that have gun rights advocates celebrating.
Court reloads Second Amendment, shoots down California's ammo background requirement
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals on Friday ruled that California’s background check law for ammunition purchases violates the Second Amendment. The decision in Rhode v. Bonta, leaned on a legal framework established by the US Supreme Court in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, which requires courts to evaluate gun laws through a […] The post Court reloads Second Amendment, shoots down California’s ammo background requirement a…
Ninth Circuit shoots down California background check mandate on
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that California’s law requiring a background check for each ammunition purchase violates the Second Amendment in Rhode v. Bonta — a case backed by the National Rifle Association and California Rifle and Pistol Association. The Ninth Circuit applied the text-and-history test set forth in the landmark Supreme Court victory, NYSRPA v. Bruen. First, the Ninth Circuit determined that the background check requi…
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 64% of the sources are Center
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium