Chinese victims of online sexual abuse face uphill battle in finding justice
Activists urge legal reforms to tackle gaps in Chinese law as victims face challenges prosecuting Telegram channels sharing non-consensual intimate images, despite some shutdowns.
- A Telegram channel called MaskPark offered revenge porn and non-consensual content of Chinese women before being shut down recently.
- The channel's exposure followed widespread social media outrage over online sexual abuse and parallels to South Korea's 2020 Nth Room case.
- Activists report that alternate channels continue to appear, victims face difficulty pursuing justice, and laws on obscene material are vague and often misapplied.
- Li Ling said Chinese Telegram channels sharing non-consensual content persist, past penalties were light with ten-day detention for one perpetrator, and Telegram promises swift removals of returned groups.
- Experts say closing legal gaps needs systemic solutions, stronger laws, platform regulation, and international cooperation to protect victims and prevent recurrence.
Insights by Ground AI
Does this summary seem wrong?
9 Articles
9 Articles

+6 Reposted by 6 other sources
Chinese victims of online sexual abuse face uphill battle in finding justice
A Telegram channel that offered revenge porn and other non-consensual content of Chinese women has highlighted gaps in laws protecting victims of sexual abuse in China.
·United States
Read Full ArticleOnline Sexual Abuse Targeting Women Explodes In China
BEIJING – Recent weeks have seen social media flooded with outrage in China after reports of widespread online sexual abuse targeting women. At the centre is a Telegram channel named “MaskPark Treehole Forum.” The group gathered more than 100,000 members, many of them Chinese men, to share non-consensual, sexually explicit photos and videos of women. […] The post Online Sexual Abuse Targeting Women Explodes in China first appeared on CTN News-Ch…
Coverage Details
Total News Sources9
Leaning Left4Leaning Right1Center3Last UpdatedBias Distribution50% Left
Bias Distribution
- 50% of the sources lean Left
50% Left
L 50%
C 38%
13%
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium