11 Articles
11 Articles
The Supreme forces banks to take responsibility for phishing thefts if the client has not been neglected.
A ruling of the Civil Division gives the reason for a client of Ibercaja who was robbed more than 83,000 euros through the phishing scam: the judges explain that the bank is responsible for the theft: "That a third party could have accessed the plaintiff's keys does not imply that he has committed negligence "The Tax Agency warns about possible cases of phishing and identity supplantations in the Rent Campaign The Supreme Court has issued a noti…


The Supreme dictates that banks are responsible for phising scams
The Supreme Court has ruled that the banks are responsible for reimbursing the money lost in phising scams or identity impersonation if they cannot prove that the client has committed serious negligence. The Civil Chamber agreed to a client who lost more than 83,000 euros with 15 transfers made the same night in a
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 100% of the sources lean Left
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
Ownership
To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage