Article 86, the...penalty and the PASOK Proposal
16 Articles
16 Articles
Nikos Androulakis, in a video on social media, claims that “New Democracy’s mockery of Article 86 reflects its institutional unreliability.” “So what changed at the most crucial point? Nothing” In his TikTok video, in the wake of the completion of the first phase of the constitutional review in the current Parliament, the president of PASOK-Movement for Change states that “today, if evidence emerges of a possible offense by a minister during the…
In the wake of the completion of the first phase of the constitutional revision in the current Parliament, Nikos Androulakis describes with a tangible example - that of article 86 - the different perspective of PASOK, as with the ND proposal the responsibility for possible prosecution of ministers belongs to the Parliament, that is to say to the respective majority. The post Androulakis on TikTok: ND's mockery proposal for article 86 reflects it…
Nikos Androulakis returns to the issue of Article 86 with a video on social media, claiming that "the mockery-proposal of the New...
Nikos Androulakis uploaded a new video on TikTok referring to the New Democracy proposal for the revision of article 86 on the criminal liability of ministers.
Nikos Androulakis, through a dynamic “appearance” on TikTok, returned to the issue of article 86, arguing that “New Democracy’s mockery proposal reflects its institutional unreliability.” The PASOK president emphasizes that ND’s proposal does not change anything at the crucial point of the decision by the parliamentary majority, in contrast to PASOK’s proposal that gives jurisdiction to judges.
Nikos Androulakis returns to the issue of article 86 with a video on social media, claiming that "New Democracy's mockery-proposal for article 86 reflects its institutional unreliability."
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 50% of the sources lean Left, 50% of the sources lean Right
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
