Appeals Court Affirms AI-Created Work Can’t Be Copyrighted
24 Articles
24 Articles
Appeals Court Affirms AI-Created Work Can’t Be Copyrighted
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit agreed, opens new tab with the U.S. Copyright Office that an image created by Stephen Thaler’s AI system “DABUS” was not entitled to copyright protection, and that only works with human authors can be copyrighted. – Reuters
Do AI robo-authors qualify for copyright? It's still no, says appeals court
Computer scientist Stephen Thaler again told his 'Creativity Machine' can't earn a © Updated The US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit has affirmed a lower court ruling that content created by an AI model without human input cannot be copyrighted. The plaintiff in this case is computer scientist Stephen Thaler, who developed a machine-learning system called the Creativity Machine that produced an image titled, A Recent Entranc…
US appeals court rejects copyrights for AI-generated art lacking 'human' creator
A federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., on Tuesday affirmed that a work of art generated by artificial intelligence without human input cannot be copyrighted under U.S. law.The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit agreed with the U.S. Copyright Office that an image created by Stephe
AI-Generated Works Cannot Be Copyrighted in the US
Photo Credit: Igor Omilaev A federal appeals court unanimously ruled that AI-generated works without human involvement do not qualify for copyright protection in the US. Computer scientist Dr. Stephen Thaler created a generative artificial intelligence (genAI) called “Creativity Machine,” which generated a picture Thaler titled, “A Recent Entrance to Paradise.” The US Copyright Office denied Thaler’s application, citing a requirement that work m…
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 80% of the sources are Center
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
Ownership
To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage