YPF Trial: 15 U.S. States Went to the Supreme Court to Support Plaintiffs Against Argentina
7 Articles
7 Articles
They questioned the ruling in favor of the country and asked the highest court to review it. They warned that it would enable national states to use local laws to avoid lawsuits in U.S. courts.
The presentation was made before the U.S. Supreme Court and questions the judgment of the Appeals Chamber that overturned the conviction of US$16.1 billion against Argentina. The entry YPF: 15 U.S. states backed the funds that seek to reverse the favorable ruling for the country was first published in #BorderPeriodismo.
A group of 15 U.S. states and territories filed a petition with the Supreme Court in support of Petersen and Eton Park, the plaintiffs in the YPF expropriation trial, who are seeking to reverse the ruling that in March overturned the US$16.1 billion conviction against Argentina. The presentation was led by...
Headed by Missouri, the writing “amicus curiae” questions the decision that favored Argentina. Attorneys general warn that the criterion applied on sovereign immunity feels a dangerous precedent.
Attorneys General of 15 U.S. states and territories filed a brief in support of Petersen and Eton Park for the Supreme Court to review Argentina's favorable ruling in the YPF expropriation trial. Read more
Attorneys-General of 15 Republican states filed a brief with the Supreme Court to back up the plaintiffs and challenge the ruling in favor of the country. They warn of a precedent that could affect future trials against foreign governments.
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 100% of the sources lean Right
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
