Amazon Says Human-in-the-Loop AI Oversight Is Failing because Humans Stop Paying Attention
5 Articles
5 Articles
Amazon says human-in-the-loop AI oversight is failing because humans stop paying attention
Amazon’s security leadership is arguing against one of the most widely accepted principles in AI governance. Eric Brandwine, VP and distinguished engineer at Amazon Security, told The Register that human-in-the-loop oversight is not the gold standard companies think it is. “Humans are not terribly consistent,” Brandwine said. “Human-in-the-loop isn’t necessarily the gold standard.” His reasoning […] This story continues at The Next Web
The Register
Why Amazon hates 'human-in-the-loop' AI governance
Humans tend to be “a little bit precious about humans,” according to Eric Brandwine, distinguished engineer and VP at Amazon Security. We like to think we are all very good at our jobs, and we have high opinions of ourselves, he explained during a phone interview with The Register. “But when you actually get down to it, humans are not terribly consistent,” Brandwine said. Humans, like AI agents and systems, are non-deterministic. Neither can be …
Eric Brandwine, Vice President of Amazon Security, told the Register that the human supervision of AI agents is not keeping pace. According to him, two problems encountered internally convinced Amazon to prefer to him automated policies of permissions.
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 50% of the sources lean Left, 50% of the sources are Center
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
