US Supreme Court denies immigration judges the power to shelve deportation cases
The justices offered no explanation as they kept a Texas-backed settlement in place, leaving thousands of deportation cases without pause authority.
- On Tuesday, the Supreme Court allowed a deportation settlement between President Donald Trump's administration and Texas to remain in force, rejecting an emergency request without explanation.
- The settlement effectively terminates a federal regulation that allowed immigration judges to pause deportation proceedings for vulnerable individuals such as neglected children or violent-crime survivors. The Justice Department agreed to set aside the rule.
- Baltimore, Columbus, and New Haven, along with Centro Legal and Raza, challenged the settlement as "egregious collusion," arguing it bypassed public participation and APA rulemaking requirements.
- District Judge Reed O'Connor approved the settlement the same day. Solicitor D. John Sauer argued the challengers' request "attempts to improperly leverage a clear-cut dispute over intervention into a far-reaching attack on the merits of a consent judgment."
- Connor previously ruled the challengers lacked legal standing because they were not directly affected by the settlement. The case remains pending at the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals.
109 Articles
109 Articles
Supreme Court declines to restore policy allowing immigration judges to close deportation cases - Regional Media News
The Supreme Court on Tuesday declined to unfreeze a Biden-era policy that allowed immigration judges to use their discretion to temporarily close deportation cases for immigrants. In an unsigned order, the court rejected a request from three cities with large migrant populations - Baltimore as well as Columbus, Ohio, and New Haven, Connecticut - to pause an agreement between Texas and the Trump administration that threw out the policy. There wer…
(LPL) – The U.S. Supreme Court rejected on Tuesday a request to reinstate a policy that allowed immigration judges to temporarily suspend certain deportation proceedings, a decision that favors the position of President Donald Trump’s government. The highest court left in force the blockade of a rule of the [...]
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 43% of the sources are Center
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
