Published • loading... • Updated
'The Year that the Shoe Dropped': How the Canada-U.S. Relationship Changed in 2025
U.S. tariffs rose to 35% targeting key Canadian industries amid stalled trade talks and political shifts, disrupting a historically integrated bilateral relationship, experts said.
- On Dec. 26, 2025, the Canada‑U.S. trade relationship was described as effectively over after U.S. tariffs began hitting Canada in March, according to observers.
- Trump escalated tariffs with threats and provocative rhetoric, including talk of tariffs and a failed Mar‑a‑Lago visit, before April 'reciprocal' tariffs and August rate hikes to 35 per cent.
- Ottawa responded by suspending its digital sales tax and tightening borders, with talks collapsing in October after an Ontario‑sponsored TV ad prompted the White House to end negotiations, the past year described as a 'partial revolution' by a university professor.
- Section 232 measures targeted key Canadian industries including steel, aluminum, automobiles, copper and lumber, causing many Canadians to feel an existential crisis, while the impact inside the United States was less evident.
- Deadlines for a deal have repeatedly passed with no clear progress, media reports of a mid-October framework failed to materialize, and Fen Osler Hampson said a swift breakthrough is unlikely.
Insights by Ground AI
34 Articles
34 Articles
‘The year that the shoe dropped’: How the Canada-U.S. relationship changed in 2025
The people anxiously sipping hot chocolate in the Canadian Embassy in Washington on a cold night in January almost a year ago couldn’t have predicted the roller-coaster of trade provocations and bilateral blow-ups the next 12 months would bring.
·Canada
Read Full Article+24 Reposted by 24 other sources
'The year that the shoe dropped': How the Canada-U.S. relationship changed in 2025
Breaking News, Sports, Manitoba, Canada
·Winnipeg, Canada
Read Full ArticleCoverage Details
Total News Sources34
Leaning Left19Leaning Right0Center5Last UpdatedBias Distribution79% Left
Bias Distribution
- 79% of the sources lean Left
79% Left
L 79%
C 21%
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium















