The TC Contradicts the Supreme Court's Thesis on "Personal Benefit" for Not Amnestying the Embezzlement of the Process
11 Articles
11 Articles
The already safe and imminent return of Carles Puigdemont, after the shocking refusal of the Supreme Court to apply the Amnesty law passed by Congress, has generated a state of boiling in the Catalan business world, which sees closer its claim to undertake, with Junts...
Constitutional Judge José María Macías fulfils his commitment so that the first two independence leaders who were still awaiting amnesty can be protected at the next plenary session.
The new draft sentence that Judge José María Macías will take to the Constitutional Plenary on October 6, this time considering Turull's application for amparo, argues that the Supreme Court did not act illogically or arbitrarily by not applying amnesty to the crime of embezzlement of the leaders of the 'procese', but instead incurred a 'lack of motivation' (not an error) in his reasoning.
Macías drafts a new draft with the arguments of the progressive majority against the refusal of the high court to amnesty embezzlement
The new draft of the report considers that the court "departed from the purpose of the rule" approved by Congress
The draft sentence indicates that the law seeks to forgive the misappropriations of the 'procedure' "with the sole exception of acts of corruption."More information: The majority of pro-government CT sees amnesty applicable to embezzlement and opens the door to Puigdemont
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 50% of the sources lean Right
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
