US EditionThe Supreme Court’s deference to the presidency is rewriting the Constitution
UNITED STATES, JUL 17 – The Supreme Court's rulings grant the presidency broad immunity and restrict courts from issuing nationwide injunctions against executive orders, shifting constitutional balance, experts say.
6 Articles
6 Articles
Endangering Article III: The Supreme Court may not have done enough to prevent a reckoning
Handed down on the last day of June, the Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v. CASA was the most important of the term. The court’s six Republican-appointed justices, in an opinion by Justice Amy Coney Barrett, ruled that district court judges can no longer issue universal or nationwide injunctions. Such injunctions exploded in the first six months of President Donald Trump’s second term, as mostly Democratic-appointed judges used them to negate …
‘They’re Not Following the Law—They’re Imposing Conservative Values’: Key Takeaways From the Ms. 2025 Supreme Court Term in Review
Friday, June 27, marked the final day of the '24-'25 Supreme Court term. This year brought a series of stunning, high-stakes decisions that delivered major setbacks for reproductive rights and civil liberties—from a landmark case threatening judiciary checks and birthright citizenship and a ruling that expands parental opt-outs in public schools, to the Court’s decision to uphold both South Carolina’s ban on Medicaid funding for Planned Parentho…
The Billings Gazette
The Supreme Court’s deference to the presidency is rewriting the Constitution
The Supreme Court’s pattern of deference to the presidency has rocked our constitutional foundations. James Madison’s assurance in Federalist No. 51 that in a republic, “the legislature necessarily predominates,” no longer holds, the over-arching principle of the rule of law…
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 50% of the sources are Center
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
