US EditionFrom 'plurality of evidence' to 'insufficient investigation': the clash between the Supreme Court and the Prosecutor's Office on Puigdemont.
6 Articles
6 Articles
The Professional and Independent Association of Prosecutors believes that the state attorney general should be dismissed because "he cannot expose himself, not even for a minute..."
The Supreme Court has given the Prime Minister the loudest slap he can remember when he unanimously admitted to opening a case for terrorism against Carles Puigdemont and Rubén Wagensberg in the context of the Tsunami case, thus assuming the theses of the judge of the National Court Manuel García-Castellón. The fact is that the High Court justifies its decision by challenging, among other things, “the statement that emerges in some politicians a…
Judges hold onto Judge García-Castellón's arguments to investigate the former Catalan president for terrorism.
Miguel Ángel Carballo recalls in his appeal that the Supreme Prosecutor's Office has not formally responded to García Castellón's request, and asks that an “apocryphal” document that is “not authenticated or sent through official channels” be sent.
“In her report, the lieutenant prosecutor of the Supreme Court questions the evidence one by one with a subjective interpretation of them, but this Chamber in cases of evidence...
New blow from the Supreme Court to the public prosecutor, Álvaro García Ortiz, and his 'number two', María Ángeles Sánchez Conde. The Criminal Chamber has unanimously agreed to open a case against Carles Puigdemont and the deputy Rubén Wagensberg for their 'absolute leadership' in the Tsunami Democràtic cause. The Supreme Court thus contradicts the argument presented by the Supreme Court's deputy prosecutor in her latest report, which concluded …
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 60% of the sources lean Right
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
