Supreme Court ruling has dire consequences for trans people, campaigners warn
- The Supreme Court ruled that only biological women can be classified as women, stating that it is biologically accurate, which may affect female spaces and sports participation standards.
- This ruling provides clarity on whether men identifying as women can use women's changing rooms based on biological sex, providing guidelines for service providers.
- Trans rights advocates argue that the ruling could prevent some transgender individuals from using facilities matching their gender identity, potentially leading to discrimination.
- The judgment emphasizes the distinction between biological sex and gender identity, suggesting that allowing biological men to identify as women undermines sex-based rights.
48 Articles
48 Articles
There’s a real threat to women’s safety - and it’s not trans people
The political narrative has fixated on trans women as the problem (Picture: John Phillips/Getty Images) At a time of global unrest, economic disparity, and deepening inequality, there’s a cruel irony in who society chooses to target. This week, with a ruling that narrows the definition of ‘woman’ to biological sex, trans people have once again been cast as a scapegoat in a conversation that should be about safety, rights, and liberation for all.…


TERF Island: How could anyone celebrate the UK Supreme Court decision?
The ones who want trans folks out of the public sphere will now feel emboldened to challenge us, to abuse us, to misgender us ~ Kell w Farshéa ~ It’s the sheer sadism of it—the corks popping outside the Supreme Court as a group of women and a couple of men cheer at excluding one of the smallest minorities in the country out of meetings, community centres, and events. They are proud of themselves. They are cheering. They see this as a great vict…
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 60% of the sources lean Left
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
Ownership
To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage