Statement of 'Bankruptcy' From the Lawyer of Famous Actor Murat Cemcir.

Cumhuriyet

Lean Left

Factuality

Ownership

An appeal has been filed against the bankruptcy ruling issued for the production company owned by actor Murat Cemcir. Cemcir's lawyer stated that the company had not received any notification and was therefore unaware of the legal proceedings.

Sözcü

Lean Left

Factuality

Ownership

The bankruptcy ruling against the production company owned by actor Murat Cemcir, which produced films such as "Çalgı Çengi İkimiz" and "Ailecek Şaşkınız" with Selçuk Aydemir, has become a topic of discussion. Cemcir's lawyer stated that the company was unaware of the process and had not received any notification regarding the decision.

anlatilaninotesi.com.tr

Factuality

Ownership

The bankruptcy decision on the production company owned by actor Murat Cemcir has been appealed. Cemcir's lawyer stated that the company has not received any notification, so it has not been informed of the judicial process and that the right of defense cannot be exercised. It was announced that legal appeals had been filed against the decision.

Karar Gazetesi

Factuality

Ownership

An appeal has been filed against the bankruptcy ruling issued for the production company owned by actor Murat Cemcir. Cemcir's lawyer stated that the company was unaware of the proceedings and therefore unable to exercise its right to defense because it had not received any official notification. The lawyer added that the necessary legal applications against the decision have been filed.

elipshaber.com

Factuality

Ownership

Legal proceedings have been initiated against the bankruptcy decision on the production company owned by actor Murat Cemcir. Cemcir's lawyer stated that no notification was made to the company and therefore the right of defense could not be exercised.

Akşam

Factuality

Ownership

Following the bankruptcy ruling against the company owned by Murat Cemcir, his lawyer, Can Cebeci, issued a statement. It was stated that the company was not informed of the process and was unable to exercise its right to defense, and that legal action has been initiated against the decision.