Superintendent Walters Calls SCOTUS Ruling a Victory Despite Uncertainty for State's Bible Directive
- On June 21, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court decided that parents have the right to exempt their children from public school instruction that conflicts with their religious convictions.
- This decision stemmed from a case in Maryland where parents opposed LGBTQ+ themed storybooks introduced by the Montgomery County school board.
- The 6-3 ruling, written by Justice Samuel Alito, affirmed that burdensome instruction threatens parental religious exercise and granted a preliminary injunction for opt-outs.
- Oklahoma Superintendent Ryan Walters praised the decision as a major win for parents’ control over education, religious freedom, and practical judgment, while continuing to require that the Bible be taught as part of history lessons.
- The ruling may prompt more legal challenges against school curricula and cause districts to censor materials to avoid religious objections, leaving future impacts uncertain.
18 Articles
18 Articles
Authors blast 'harmful' SCOTUS ruling allowing parents to opt kids out of reading their LGBTQ+ books
Authors and illustrators of the controversial LGBTQ+ children's books at the center of Friday's Supreme Court ruling blasted the decision as "discriminatory and harmful" in a joint statement.The justices decided 6-3 in Mahmoud v. Taylor that parents can exclude their children from a Maryland public school system's lessons that contain themes about homosexuality and transgenderism if they feel the material conflicts with their religious faith. Th…
PGCPS interim superintendent addresses past controversies, outlines 100-day plan
A children’s book author never imagined her work would wind up in a Supreme Court discussion, so it was “surreal” to be mentioned in the case of Maryland elementary school parents who sued their school district to allow them to opt their kids out of reading books with LGBTQ+ themes. In a case that originated in Montgomery County, the high court ruled Friday that schools must provide notice and an opt-out option when assigning books with LGBTQ+ t…
Mahmoud decision says Maryland parents can opt children out of curriculum that violates their religious beliefs - The Sentinel
In a much-anticipated case centered on religious freedom, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Mahmoud v. Taylor that a group of Maryland parents can remove their children from school lessons if those lessons violate their beliefs. The 6-3 decision in Mahmoud pitted parents with Muslim, Jewish, and Christian backgrounds against the school board of Montgomery County, Maryland, which in 2022 introduced homosexual and LGBTQ+ materials into its public sc…
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 50% of the sources lean Right
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium