Published • loading... • Updated
Climate Activists v. the U.S. Energy Industry: Cases to Watch in 2026
The Supreme Court will consider whether state nuisance laws can hold Chevron liable for climate-related harms, after a $744 million coastal wetlands damages verdict in Louisiana.
- On Jan. 12, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Plaquemines Parish v. Chevron USA Inc., elevating the case's national stakes.
- After years of filings, climate-focused public-nuisance suits have proliferated in state courts, with the City of Boulder and Boulder County suing energy firms for alleged misleading conduct contributing to local climate effects.
- Federal-Preemption and permit defenses shape the litigation strategy as Suncor Energy lawyers argue the Clean Air Act preempts state claims, while Chevron sought but the U.S. Supreme Court declined to rule on merits.
- A Plaquemines Parish jury awarded $744 million against Chevron USA Inc. for coastal-wetlands harm, with environmental activists celebrating and the Louisiana Association of Business and Industry warning of job losses.
- Political and ideological objections now factor heavily into how the cases proceed, with critics including O.H. Skinner saying the litigation seeks large settlements and threatens U.S. energy independence.
Insights by Ground AI
38 Articles
38 Articles
Climate activists v. the U.S. energy industry: Cases to watch in 2026
(The Center Square) – Anti-oil and gas advocates across the country have pursued litigation in recent years attempting to force the fossil fuel industry to pay for decades of financial damages the advocates claim were caused by climate change.
Can climate protection be enforced in court? Jurist Jannika Jahn explains why activists are increasingly choosing the legal path, which procedures are successful and which ones are not.
·Germany
Read Full ArticleCoverage Details
Total News Sources38
Leaning Left3Leaning Right10Center8Last UpdatedBias Distribution48% Right
Bias Distribution
- 48% of the sources lean Right
48% Right
14%
C 38%
R 48%
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium


















