All Perspectives, One Place.
Get Started
SubscribeLogin
Israel-Hamas Conflict
Pope Francis
Social Media
Vladimir Putin
WWE
Donald Trump
Baseball
Soccer
Artificial Intelligence
Premier League
Mother's Day
Motorsports
World War II
Published • loading... • Updated

PepsiCo Case: Were the 2013 Amendments to the Income Tax General Anti-Avoidance Rule Effective? - Austaxpolicy: The Tax and Transfer Policy Blog

Summary by Austaxpolicy: The Tax and Transfer Policy Blog
Kate Roff details how Part IVA works, including why it was introduced and why, in 2013, the then government considered remedial amendments were necessary.
DisclaimerThis story is only covered by news sources that have yet to be evaluated by the independent media monitoring agencies we use to assess the quality and reliability of news outlets on our platform. Learn more here.

1 Articles

All
Left
Center
Right
Austaxpolicy: The Tax and Transfer Policy BlogAustaxpolicy: The Tax and Transfer Policy Blog

PepsiCo Case: Were the 2013 Amendments to the Income Tax General Anti-Avoidance Rule Effective? - Austaxpolicy: The Tax and Transfer Policy Blog

Kate Roff details how Part IVA works, including why it was introduced and why, in 2013, the then government considered remedial amendments were necessary.

Read Full Article
Think freely.Subscribe and get full access to Ground NewsSubscriptions start at $9.99/yearSubscribe

Bias Distribution

  • There is no tracked Bias information for the sources covering this story.
Factuality

To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium

Ownership

To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage

Austaxpolicy: The Tax and Transfer Policy Blog broke the news in on Wednesday, April 23, 2025.
Sources are mostly out of (0)
Stories disproportionately reported by the Left or the Right

Similar News Topics

Australia

Australia

You have read out of your 5 free daily articles.

Join us as a member to unlock exclusive access to diverse content.

News
For You
SearchBlindspotLocal