‘A Gun Wasn’t Held to Their Heads’: Alleged Fraudster’s Lawyer Says He Was Deceived by Overseas Operators
- The lawyer claims that being convincing about something believed to be true does not qualify as fraud, emphasizing that no one was forced into the situation.
- Margaretic stated that everyone received payments as promised for their investments.
- He asserted that all funds were accounted for, indicating that investors were satisfied with their interest payments.
- Margaretic acknowledged that, in hindsight, the situation might appear different.
Insights by Ground AI
Does this summary seem wrong?
11 Articles
11 Articles

+3 Reposted by 3 other sources
‘A gun wasn’t held to their heads’: Alleged fraudster’s lawyer says he was deceived by overseas operators
Chris Marco’s defence lawyer told WA’s Supreme Court his client was not guilty of defrauding his investors of $36.5 million because he genuinely believed he was working legimately.
·Sydney, Australia
Read Full ArticleCoverage Details
Total News Sources11
Leaning Left5Leaning Right1Center1Last UpdatedBias Distribution71% Left
Bias Distribution
- 71% of the sources lean Left
71% Left
L 71%
14%
14%
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium